As noted in my February 2012 Newsletter, Mahoney J declined to grant a DRP exemption in IBM v
As noted in my February 2012 Newsletter, Mahoney J declined to grant a DRP exemption in IBM v
Clackson J in Lafarge Canada Inc. v Edmonton (City) 2012 ABQB 634 says a Statement of Claim “serves
QB DECISION: Mahoney J refused to grant IBM’s application to waive the DRP provisions of the Rules in
QB DECISION: Mahoney J refused to grant IBM’s application to waive the DRP provisions of the Rules in IBM
“How we are treated—the fairness of the procedure—has as much to do with our satisfaction as the ultimate
Stay of Proceedings Pending Arbitration
The ABCA has upheld an ABQB decision to stay proceedings by a 3rd party pending arbitration between others. See Yaworski